Facts, diesel engines powerstroke - duramax - Ford Muscle Forums : Ford Muscle Cars Tech Forum
  • 1 Post By ranchininPink
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 1 (permalink) Old 02-13-2017, 05:18 PM Thread Starter
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 1
Facts, diesel engines powerstroke - duramax


Diesel engines all fire their mix using high compression, and they need precisely controlled fuel delivery, both in regard to timing and volume. Diesels typically spin slower than gas-burners, but the torque that diesel engines are capable of producing is practically legendary. That’s one reason heavy-duty truck manufacturers went diesel on their heaviest platforms so many years ago. So, why does a diesel produce more torque?
The firing events on a given four-cycle cylinder are 720 degrees apart, and 720 divided by 8 is 90. Thus, a properly tuned V8 has a firing event every 90 degrees. However, because all the fire has gone out in each cylinder by the time the crankshaft is 25 degrees into the power stroke for the firing piston, the cylinders on a gas-burning engine are only briefly slapping the crankshaft every 90 degrees. The reason a diesel has so much more torque is that the fire starts later and diesel fuel burns slower; subsequently, the mix is burning and expanding all the way through the power stroke.

A diesel engine has an unrestricted flow of air, and the amount of carbon monoxide produced by a diesel engine is negligible. Diesel engines do, however, produce substantial amounts of NOX, as well as some hydrocarbons and particulate matter. For 21st century diesel light trucks to operate within legal emissions limits, many have been fitted with catalysts and EGR systems. These new emissions-friendly diesels, like their older counterparts, depend very heavily on the precision with which the injection of fuel is controlled. Cummins diesel engines, depending on the platform, either utilize either high fuel pressure of 17,000 psi and mechanically driven “top stop” injectors or pump-driven nozzles that pop at about 4,500 psi when provided with carefully timed bursts of fuel pressure from an electronically manipulated Bosch “smart pump.”

For those unfamiliar with Ford’s Power Stroke diesel engine, you should note that it uses from 500 to 3,000 psi of electronically controlled lube oil pressure applied to the top of a 7-to-1 intensifier piston built into the injector itself. Because the 500 to 3,000 psi of control oil pressure is multiplied by seven, the fuel injection spray pressure runs from 3,500 to 21,000 psi.

The Duramax diesel fuel system needs the same super pressures that all diesels need in order to properly inject the fuel. However, instead of using bursts of high pressure or lube oil pressure, the Isuzu/Bosch team decided to jack the fuel pressure up with a special pump and control the injection with a special module, high voltage and electronic injectors.
DURAMAX FUEL DELIVERYFord’s first-generation Power Stroke fuel pump used a two-stage fuel pump to bring the fuel from the tank to the engine and then pressurize it around 50 psi for delivery to the injectors. In comparison, the Duramax also uses a two-stage fuel pump, but rather than utilizing a diaphragm-type pump for lift, a pair of spur gears is used to bring fuel from the supply. The spur gear pump creates about 5 inches of vacuum to draw fuel from the tank, where it first passes under the Fuel Injector Control Module (FICM). The FICM is a neatly boxed array of step-up transformers and electronics similar to the Power Stroke’s Injector Driver Module.

The reason the fuel passes under the FICM is to keep the module cool. Then it is drawn through a heater equipped filter/separator, which has a priming pump and a bleed screw, before reaching the two-stage fuel pump. The spur gears feed the fuel into the high-pressure side of the pump, which is a radial design with three pistons set 120 degrees apart. This camshaft-driven pump only consumes a fraction of the torque necessary to drive a normal injector pump and is capable of producing nearly 30,000 psi of fuel pressure. The pump pressure obviously must be regulated, and for safety purposes, is the Bosch folks designed a popoff valve that feeds excess pressure back into the return side of the system.

The fuel pressure is electronically controlled by the Fuel Rail Pressure Regulator (FRPR). The FRPR is a duty-cycle solenoid mounted in the pump and controlled by the Electronic Control Module (ECM) based on feedback from an electronic sensor in the junction block that provides fuel to the supply rails. The FRPR duty-cycle operates in a 5 to 95 percent window, and unplugging the solenoid drives the fuel pressure to the maximum level instead of vice versa, as we might expect. The ECM increases pulse width to lower pressure, so if the solenoid receives a 100 percent dutycycle for some reason, pressure will be at its lowest, and performance will obviously degrade. A 5 percent duty-cycle will produce a fuel pressure of 23,200 psi, and a 95 percent duty-cycle feed will produce a 5,000 psi reading. The pressure should never go below 3,000 psi; if it does, something is wrong. The Tech 2 scan tool provides target and actual fuel pressure readings for diagnostic purposes.
A frame-mounted electric fuel pump is used on units with dual tanks, but it doesn’t directly provide fuel to the engine. It only transfers fuel from the auxiliary tank to the primary tank when the fuel level gets below a certain level. The ECM controls the relay that drives the pump and monitors the fuel level to determine when the pump should be energized.
On the Power Stroke, the Injection Control Pressure regulator, which is similar but opposite in function to GM/Isuzu’s FRPR, operates on a duty-cycle from zero to 65 percent, and oil control pressure drops to zero with the regulator unplugged. If the ICP control wire shorts to ground, the pressure goes as high as 3,750 psi, relieved by a pop-off valve in the high-pressure oil pump. Use common sense safety practices when servicing any diesel system: While maximum control oil pressure on a Power Stroke can reach nearly 4,000 psi, the Duramax fuel system is pressure-relieved at a blistering 27,550 psi. Cracking a fuel line loose on a running Duramax engine could easily be fatal. Don’t go there. And don’t fool with the Duramax fuel rail bleeder valve unless the engine is at rest and the pressure has been relieved.


Fuel is fed from the high-pressure pump to a junction block that sends fuel to the “common rails,” which provide the controlled fuel pressure to the injectors. The Fuel Rail Pressure (FRP) sensor is mounted in this junction block, along with the mechanically operated pressure relief valve. The sensor is a three-wire design that receives the familiar 5 volts and provides a signal return. If fuel pressure exceeds 27,550 psi, the relief valve unseats and bounces to maintain fuel pressure at that level. Relief pressure is vented into the return system through a line attached to the junction block. Remember, maximum controlled pressure is 23,200 psi, and anything above that should be compared to the scan tool reading of the FRPR pulse width the ECM is providing for detailed analysis.
If the FRP sensor is removed from the junction block for any reason, GM procedures call for replacing the sensor with a new one. The soft iron seat will be deformed the first time the new sensor is torqued, and the old sensor might not seal properly if reused.
COMMON RAILS AND INJECTORSThe common rails are similar to the oil rails on a Power Stroke, but they carry fuel instead of oil, and they’re mounted externally instead of under the valve cover or cast into the cylinder head. The volume of each common fuel rail is 16 cubic centimeters and they serve as reservoirs to provide a constant volume of fuel and dampen oscillations as the injectors operate. Short metal lines carry the fuel from the rail to each injector, and metal return lines return the fuel through a small radiator-like cooler. The return fuel must be free-flowing all the way back to the supply.

The Bosch injectors are directly in the center of the four-valve combustion chamber; this is a direct injection system with no precombustion chambers. The ECM is programmed to operate the injectors in two stages; an early, small shot of fuel starts the fire in the combustion chamber and is immediately followed by a larger amount of fuel. This strategy reduces noise and hydrocarbon emissions.
The 7.3L Power Stroke engines have used basically the same split-shot injector strategy for years, but the primary difference is that the 7.3L Power Stroke nozzles had the split-shot design mechanically built in to the injector itself. The new 6.0L Power Stroke handles split shot injection more like the Duramax, but it uses two solenoids and a special electronic strategy to provide the double injection for each injector cycle and still operates with high oil pressure.


Quite obviously, the heart of the Duramax electronic diesel is a Delphi 32U ECM, and it has been nestled in the same familiar corner of the engine compartment in GM trucks for a few years now. The ECM communicates with the Fuel Injector Control Module (FICM) on a 250,000 Buad rate J1939 CAN bus network (the new 6.0L Power Stroke also uses a CAN bus between its PCM and Injector Control Module), but data exchanges with the scan tool Diagnostic Communication Link (DLC) are handled with Class 2 data protocol. Fuel injection quantity and timing are calculated in the ECM and sent to the FICM, where the step-up transformers juice normal system voltage up to a crisp 93 volts to operate the injectors sequentially with highspeed switching drivers. The Duramax cylinder numbering may confuse older Chevy lovers: They’re numbered exactly like the Power Stroke, with odd cylinders one through seven on the passenger-side bank and even cylinders two through eight on the driver’sside bank. The firing order is 1-2-7-8-4-5-6-3 – not that you’re likely to get anything crossed up. (Just for grins, the Power Stroke firing order is 1-2-7-3-4-5-6-8.)
Incidentally, the Tech 2 doesn’t talk directly to the FICM, but injector trouble codes are generated by the FICM and sent to the ECM when problems occur on that side of the system. GM says not to attempt harness repairs on the high-voltage side of the system, but to replace the harness if anything goes sour on the 93-volt circuits. Wiring repairs on the low-voltage side of the FICM and the rest of the ECM spider web can be handled in the normal manner.


My technician contact at the local high volume Chevy dealer reports very few problems with Duramax engines, and the problems that do occur don’t seem to repeat themselves. He mentioned one squeaky rocker arm and blown head gaskets on two different high-mileage vehicles, but no recurring problems.

As for troubleshooting the Duramax, it’s best to use a strategy that won’t lead down rabbit trails. Verifying the concern is a good idea. Checking the air filter minder is another good practice. Also, check for unseated connectors, but be careful not to disturb things too much if you’re looking for an intermittent. Don’t risk probing the high-voltage wires leading to the injectors: Adhere to shop manual procedures for checking the 93-volt circuits. An electrically triggered heart attack could ruin your whole day. And once again, don’t open the fuel system until you’re sure the pressure is at safe levels.

Yank the dipstick and look for low or nasty oil or overfull conditions that may indicate fuel contamination of the crankcase oil, among other things. Number 2 diesel usually has a specific gravity of 30 to 39 and Number 1 diesel gravity is from 39 to 44. GM’s tool number for measuring this is J 38641 B. Make sure the appropriate fuel is being used: Off-road diesel – dyed red or blue – is a no-no.

Check for restrictions or air leaks in the fuel supply line for hard-starting/low-power problems. Zero to 5 inches of mercury supply line vacuum is normal on a running engine. Measurements between 5 and 10 inches indicate the need for a filter change. After 15 inches, performance will degrade dramatically, and more than 20 inches of measured vacuum is enough to starve the engine into a no-start condition. For investigating air leaks in the supply line, a clear hose installed between the FICM outlet and the filter inlet works well.

White smoke generally indicates intake heater or glow plug concerns. Black smoke comes from air leaks in the intake system downstream of the MAF sensor. Noisy or knocking combustion may indicate a leaking injector. Hunting idle concerns may indicate fuel pressure control problems.

Plug in the scan tool and pay attention to DTCs, fuel pressure and temperature, target or desired readings versus actual values. Familiarizing yourself with normal scan tool readings on as many good vehicles as possible is a powerful tool for recognizing faults on any problem vehicle.
makonnen is offline Reply With Quote

Old 09-13-2012, 11:23 PM #3
Senior Member
Thread Starter

Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Pacific NW coast~!
Posts: 2,023

Brief History So without going into too many boring details, but confusing all the same, “Powerstroke” is the Ford name for the engine developed by International, using State of the Art (for 1993) Caterpillar design Diesel Injection Technology known as HEUI, or Hydraulically actuated Electronically controlled Unit Injector. This basic HEUI architecture was available in Ford F-250 through F-750 series trucks, and E series Vans from 1994 through 2007. In 2008 Ford again Jumped ahead of the competition in technology by going to Common Rail Injection (not new) using Piezo crystal injectors developed by Bosch. The use of the Piezo injector was the first by a Domestic automaker in any application, and had been previously used ONLY on high end European diesels. More on that later.

HEUI Hydraulically actuated, Electronically controlled, Unit Injector. So what exactly does that mean? It means that from 1995 through 2007 ALL Ford light and medium duty diesel trucks did not have an injection pump. None, nada, zip. This is in fact one of the HUGE factors in favor of using a Powerstroke for biofuels. It is impossible to cause a catastrophic failure by breaking the injection pump because it does not exist. Each Injector is in fact its own Injection Pump. Although the design changed a bit between the 7.3 and the 6.0, the basic concept is the same. Each unit injector basically has two sections- One for fuel, and one for high Pressure engine Oil. Unless there is a mechanical failure the two fluids should never contact each other. The fuel provided by a low pressure fuel pump(~55psi), and the Engine Oil is delivered by a High Pressure Oil Pump(HPOP). The HPOP uses low pressure crankcase engine oil and pressurizes it to between 500 and 3000psi based on the duty cycle of the IPR(injection pressure regulator) that is controlled by the PCM(Powertrain Control Module). The delivery path to the engine for the fuel varies based on year with 3 primary designs we will discuss in later segments. But once the fuel reaches the engine itself, the rest is all the same. The engine is a V-block design with two cylinder heads and 8 cylinders. On the Left(Drivers) side you have cylinders 2,4,6,8 from front to back, and the right(passenger) side is numbered 1,3,5,7 front to back. In each head there are 4 large round holes that feed all the way down to the combustion chamber in almost a reverse cone shape. Those are the injector cups where the injectors are positioned in the head with the tip actually protruding into the top of the combustion chamber. Also in each head are two passageways that run the length of the head. And here is reason #1 why these engine make such excellent conversion candidates. The fuel rail is inside the head, and the fuel system is a deadhead design, meaning there is no return from the engine. That means the fuel moves relatively slowly through the head until it reaches the injector. During that time the oil is picking up heat directly from the motor. Some may argue this point but I have tested it over and over again. So long as the engine is up to operating temperature it is IMPOSSIBLE to get cold oil to the injector. Of the two passages in the head- One is for fuel, and the other is for high pressure oil. Reason #2 that the Powerstroke makes a great conversion candidate . Precise fuel pressure is rather unimportant. Again, yes I said Precise fuel pressure in NOT important. The fuel pressure only needs to be enough to promote proper filling of the injector fuel cavity. Regardless of year, anything south of 50 psi and you may not get complete injector filling under load, anything north of 100 psi and you run the risk of interfering with correct injector operation. That leaves us with a nice liberal 50psi window for fuel pressure that will have no effect whatsoever on performance, power, emissions, mileage or anything else. This is PART 3 of why Powerstrokes make such great conversion candidates. Fuel pressure requirements are very non-specific, More than enough, and less than too much. Where the magic happens is with the High pressure oil. Both the 6.0 and the 7.3 have a 7:1 intensifier piston that multiplies the pressure of the high pressure oil by 7 and transfers it to the low pressure fuel to create a maximum injection pressure of 21,000 psi for the 7.3 and 26,000 psi for the 6.0! That is a max of 3,000psi of HPO for the 7.3 and 3,770 for the 6.0. So to recap, high pressure engine oil pushes on a piston that then pressurizes and injects the fuel into the cylinder. So the viscosity of the fuel does not change the injection pressure at all in this type of system. It could be solid Crisco in the injector and it will still be delivered to the cylinder. However the ability of the injector to refill after that initial injection is a whole other story. Now that you know the basics of HEUI injection, we can cover the three basic generations of Powerstroke.

1994.5-1997 In 1994 you could get 3 different diesel options for your Ford. There was a 7.3 Non turbo Indirect injected (IDI), a Turbo IDI, and the coveted 7.3 Powerstroke Direct Injected Turbo Diesel. As previously mentioned in 1993 Caterpillar developed the HEUI injection system, and International, under license from Caterpillar created the Powerstroke engine for Ford. The International version was known as the T444E. International used their old 7.3 IDI engine as the starting point for the new DI 7.3, and carried over some of the same features such as the Water to oil heat exchanger mounted on the drivers side. This advanced engine at the time quickly became backbone of the Light and medium duty diesel market powering not only Ford Trucks and Vans, but Ambulances, Service vehicles, Busses, Box trucks, and Millions upon millions of vehicles.

FUEL DELIVERY The challenge In converting these years of Powerstroke is in the fuel delivery system. They use a two stage mechanical lift pump mounted in the engine valley between the heads. Fuel is fed directly from the tank to the low pressure side of the pump, then into the Fuel bowl where it passes through the filter, and back to the high pressure side of the pump, out the back and to the rear fuel ports on the engine. The return is fed out the front fuel ports, through the regulator attached to the side of the fuel bowl, and back to the tank. From a performance standpoint this is a great setup as it is a true regulated return. But from a conversion standpoint it creates several issues, Such as cross contamination, long purge times, lift pump reliability and the fact the the regulator recirculates a small amount of return fuel back into the fuel bowl. DFA solves those issues by simply eliminating the mechanical lift pump in favor of an electric one and updating the fuel system to mimic that of the 1999 and newer Powerstrokes, Or basically a deadhead design. It is a bit more work and cost, but reliability goes up, purge time goes WAY down, and cross contamination is eliminated and we still use the OEM fuel filter for the diesel.

1998. This is a bit confusing for the uninformed. Officially there is no 1998 model year for the Heavy Duty Ford F-250-F-550 Series Pickup. This was the year that ford went to two different platforms for its trucks- The light duty F-150 and the New Super Duty series of heavy duty work truck available as the F-250 up to F-550. Diesels were not available in the light duty F-150. Where this conversation is about diesel, we will only focus on the Super Duty platform. So if there was no 1998 MY, what was available in 1998? You had a few options. You could buy a 1997 OBS truck(Old Body Style) or the All New Early 1999 MY(Model Year) Super Duty. There were however 1998 MY E-series vans with the Powerstroke diesel. The 1998 E-series had the same updated Powerstroke engine that the 1999-2003 Super Duty would get with the electric lift pump.
1999-2003. These are among the Best, most reliable and heavy duty pickup trucks ever made. Ever. The Crew cab can fit a family of 6 easily. Even if they are 6’6” tall! The cabin space is simply perfect. The drive train is nearly bullet proof save for the transmission. And the 7.3? Well it really became something special during these years. The 7.3 has proven to be exceptionally reliable, and nearly indestructible, so long as you are not trying to make 500hp with them. The truck was released in 1998 as a 1999 model, but there are really two generations of 1999. There is the Early 99, made prior to 12/98, and then the late 99. The differences are subtle, but many. On the engine the Turbo is smaller, the intake is smaller, the turbo pedestal is different, The HPOP is different, Suspension is different, and some of the interior options are different. The trucks are most easily identified by the location of the powerstroke badge. The early 99’s have the “V8 Powerstroke” badge on the Front fender, and the late 99-03 7.3 have the Powerstroke badge on the door. Generally speaking the late 99 trucks are more desirable to have, and the conversion process is slightly easier. In 2002 The Super Duty got clear headlights, a significant change in wiring and Gages, and finally ALL super Duty’s (except the Excursion) got a real Dana 60 Front differential instead of the half breed Dana 50. The engine remains unchanged.

Fuel Delivery. Beginning in 1998 with the E-series Van and in 1999 with the Super Duty trucks, Ford went with an electric lift pump and a deadhead fuel design. The path of fuel flow is from the tank, through the electric lift pump on the frame under the drivers seat, to the Fuel bowl in the engine valley, through a simple poppet regulator, and back to the tank. This causes the fuel bowl to pressurize, forcing fuel through the filter, and out the two fuel lines on the passenger side of the fuel bowl to the OEM fuel feed ports on the engine. One feeds to the Passenger side rear(cylinder 7), the other to the Drivers side front(cylinder 2). The opposite ends of the fuel ports that was used on the earlier years has been plugged off. That means that fuel is only fed to the engine, but never returns from the engine. Tidbit- Factory spec for the fuel pressure is 54psi plus or minus 3. Typically I see anywhere from 60-70 psi on most trucks. But remember from earlier, anything north of 50 and south of 100 is adequate. This fuel system design while simple, had it’s drawbacks as well. Mainly in that the firing order is 1,2,7,3,4,5,6,8. If you remember from earlier, the cylinder arrangement on the drivers side is 2,4,6,8, and fuel is fed into the rail by #2. That puts #8 at the “dead” end of the fuel rail. It is getting what fuel is left over from the other cylinders. Then to further complicate matters is that #6 fires immediately before #8. So #6 is further robbing #8 for fuel. This leads to a constant state of fuel starvation for #8. There are a few ways to combat this problem. Ford, devised the so called “Long Lead” injector. This was a futile attempt at incorrectly solving the problem by modifying an injector with a longer filling time. It didn’t work. The aftermarket had some much more effective ways of dealing with this by either shimming the pressure regulator to increase fuel pressure therefore helping to overcome restrictions to flow and allowing more fuel to #8, or the more expensive but better option which was the regulated return. Fuel was fed all the way through the head, and pressure was regulated after the injectors, not before. This ensured a much more stable fuel pressure for ALL injectors and eliminated any starvation issues. This resulted in a much quieter engine, smoother idle, and some gain power, maybe as much as 15hp on an otherwise stock truck. One other issue that was well known was that the Ford fuel system was known for getting air into the fuel either from the fuel line seals between the pump and tank, or from the fuel pickup in the tank itself. This air would get trapped in the heads with nowhere to go but through the injectors. Fortunately the injectors on the 7.3 were very robust, and the fuel starvation or the air did not have any real detrimental effect on the life of the engine or injectors. There are plenty of bone stock 7.3’s with 500,000 miles or more on them. One other item of note that is really only for the horsepower junkies is that in 2001 Ford started using PMR process connecting rods instead of the Forged rods it had been using since 1994. Ideally the PMR rods have a higher tensile strength and greater hardness then the Forged rods, but they were also much more brittle, and when used with an unreinforced crankcase were more prone to breakage than the much more forgiving Forged rods. Rule of thumb is no more than 400hp with PMR’s, and up to 500hp with the Forged.

The End. 2003 would mark the last year that you could buy a Ford truck in the United States with the coveted 7.3 Powerstroke ending a highly successful 10 year run that helped make the Ford Super Duty the undisputed champion of Reliable Hard working trucks. Federal emissions regulations, and increasing HP/TQ demands in the marketplace dictated the need for a newer, smaller, more efficient, more powerful, and more emissions friendly engine. And in 2003, the all new high tech 6.0 Powerstroke was released, becoming one of the biggest black eyes Ford Trucks have ever known.

6.0 Powerstroke. This engine was the future of Diesels. High tech and High Power. The all new 6.0 had Four Valves per cylinder, A variable Vane turbo that could provide maximum boost off idle, smaller more efficient HEUI injectors operating at up to 26,000 psi, Pilot Injection that made the motor super quiet for a diesel. The block was a two piece design now with the crank being held in place by the two halves of the block ensuring an extremely strong and rigid bottom end. And finally the old 4R100, formerly the E4OD that has been around since the 80’s gets replaced with a modern 5 speed automatic made for diesel use, called the 5R110. The 5R110 was better in every way than the outgoing 4R100. These Transmissions had very few issues, if any. The same could not be said for the motor.

Pick your poison. International who designed the 6.0 had already been using them in their fleet fairly successfully. However the consumer light truck market was different than the commercial truck market. Ford didn’t dare release a new engine that couldn’t match or better the competitors HP and TQ numbers. And of course it had to be quieter as well. This required a higher RPM, a different turbo, and modified injectors from the original International design the meet the requirements. The engine had already been through substantial testing and validating, so changing a few items shouldn’t cause much problem.

OOPS! Ford and International couldn’t have been more WRONG! Injectors started failing on the showroom floor causing hydro-locking, cylinder washing and often complete engine failure . Something to do with the pilot injection to make the engine quieter. Then the head gaskets started leaking. The Main Seals leaked very quickly. Then the actuator for the variable vane turbo started getting stuck from soot. Next the EGR coolers started leaking or failing altogether, besides the EGR valve becoming stuck. High pressure oil pumps had a high rate of failure, Internal High pressure oil connections would pop off casuing the motor to quit altogether on the spot, And the list went on. Before the end of the year Ford had more TSB’s (Technical Service Bulletins) for repairs and problems then Chevy and Dodge Combined. Not all motors failed. Some never had a problem, and the ones that ran, ran extremely well. But probably on the order of 1 in 10 had major repairs that needed to be performed. Approximately 3 in 10 had minor issues that had to be addressed. Probably the most problem prone motor to be released since the Chevy 350 diesel. Quickly Ford started reprogramming the trucks cutting back the power, eliminating pilot injection, reducing throttle response to help minimize coking of the EGR and Turbo, and some other stuff. This resulted in fewer problems, but the trucks didn’t run well at all. The pulling power was gone, mileage went down, they were every bit as noisy as the 7.3, and still had rampant EGR problems. In 2005 the engine was nearly completely overhauled. The injectors were redesigned, the heads were redesigned, the Turbo had already been revised, the EGR cooler was reworked, the seals upgraded, and the programming figured out. This resulted in dramatically more reliable engines that had the power they were supposed to. And instead of 1 in 10 having problems, that number went down to closer to 1 in 1000 with major issues. And even then the major issues were typically turbos, egr’s and HPOP’s. The injectors were much more reliable, but still sensitive to low fuel pressure. So injectors were only an issue if proper maintenance and filter changes were not adhered to, or if someone got a bad batch of diesel. EGR valves still would stick somewhat regularly, but the aftermarket had by then come up with a bypass, or simply turned the EGR off electronically. This not only prevented EGR issues, but actually improved fuel mileage slightly. The EGR was strictly for emissions and was not required for the engine to run correctly. The EGR cooler is the one item that did not necessarily improve with the later year trucks, but again the aftermarket has EGR cooler delete kits.

6.0 Conversion?To get back on track, the injectors were one of the critical components for converting the 6.0. Many people and companies attempted to convert the 6.0 to run on oil, and failed. There were a few reasons for this. First the OEM fuel system has two filters- One on the Frame at the fuel pump also known as FCM, or Fuel conditioning module. This housed the primary fuel filter, fuel pump, thermal fuel recirculation valve, and water separation. From there the fuel traveled to the secondary filter bowl on the engine. This fuel bowl is similar in operation to that of the 7.3. There is a simple poppet valve regulator that pressurizes the fuel bowl to about 54psi forcing the fuel through the filter through two fuel lines and to the injector fuel rails. Except in this case the fuel is fed through the front of the engine using 12mm Banjo Fittings. There are fittings at the opposite ends of the fuel rails, but like the 7.3 they are plugged. This is still a deadhead fuel system, and again like the 7.3, on the drivers side the fuel is fed through the front, and deadheaded at the back, at #8 injector. The fuel starvation issue isn’t as bad since the fuel rails have a larger volume that better deal with the deadhead design. At least until you get into the higher horsepower applications. When trying to feed oil through the OEM fuel system filter plugging was a major problem. It is nearly impossible to keep enough heat in the oil for the oil to make it past both filters without waxing and eventual plugging. Then of course once the filters plug, switching back to diesel does no good. It is too late at that point. The engine loses fuel pressure, you are stuck, and there is a very likely chance your injectors are ruined from the low fuel pressure. There is only one way to successfully convert the 6.0 to run on 100% SVO with no problems. And that is a completely separate pressure based fuel system designed to handle the viscosity of the oil and ensure that the injectors never lose pressure. The DFA Vegistroke is the only vegetable oil conversion system currently that operates that way. And because of that we have converted hundreds of 6.0’s without issue. In fact we have some 6.0’s out with over 100,000 miles on oil already! Not all systems are the same when done correctly the 6.0 can run perfectly find on oil without creating problems not already inherent to the motor.

To Recap- The 6.0 PowerStroke can be converted to run on oil successfully without more than normal maintenance or failures if done with a quality pressure based fuel system that will ensure the injectors never lose pressure. The system does not help prevent other engine issues such as EGR coking and sticking, head gasket issues, cylinder washing from bad injectors, etc.

The Rest Of the Truck. The chassis has not had a major overhaul since its introduction in 1999, however almost nothing remains unchanged. Even the frame itself is considerably different. However the exterior dimensions remain unchanged from 1999-2009. Why mess with perfection? In 2005 besides some pretty serious interior changes the Truck got a facelift with a new grill, bumper, and integrated crystal headlights/turn lamps. This look is in my opinion one of the best looking trucks Ford ever made. And the good news for those with older trucks is that these parts are a direct bolt on that can be done in a matter of a few hours. 2005 was the first year that the heavy duty trucks would get a coil spring front suspension that helped ride considerably and turning radius.

6.4- A new Era of Uncertainty. For 2008 model year Ford released the latest and LAST International designed motor- The twin turbo 6.4l common rail, piezo injector high tech motor. Even though the basic construction itself is the same as the 6.0, Everything that was an issue with 6.0 was addressed. First the fuel system. This would mark the first time that HEUI injection would not be used for the Powerstroke. The fuel system is now a common rail injection system using a first in the industry Piezo injector. These crystal based injectors have such a quick reaction time that they can be fired 5 times per combustion stroke!! The injection system is nothing short of sensational and completely different from the Cummins or Isuzu(Duramax) systems which both rely on CPS injection pumps and very similar style injectors. Other issues addressed besides the injection was the reputation for weak headgaskets. The heads were revised and headbolts were upsized from 14mm to 16mm and no longer hold the rocker arm fulcrum. The EGR cooler was significantly revised and more than doubled in size for cooler exhaust temps into the intake and less EGR failures. Due to the dual turbos AND variable vane the torque curve is incredible making over 500lb-ft from 1300 rpm to 3300 rpm. Reliability has been improved from last to on par with the others. In fact the 6.4 has had fewer issues than the new 6.7 Cummins engine. The only real issue of concern was radiators cracking on the early trucks, but that was easily fixed with a quickly installed factory coolant pressure bleed port to prevent excessive cooling system pressure. The only real downside to the new motors is the EPA mandated emissions control, AKA DPF(diesel Particulate filter). This exhaust filter traps ALL soot in the exhaust. Cool factor is that after 30,000 miles in our 08 there is not even a hint of anything black in the tailpipe. Downside is that it is a massive restriction in the exhaust system making the engine work harder to make the same power and also uses extra fuel to “regenerate” or burn all the soot in the filter thereby cleaning it. This reduces the fuel economy considerably to the point that most average about 12-13 not towing anything. Removing the DPF and reprogramming can net a MPG increase of 7-10mpgs. And unlike the days of the E4OD and 4R100, the 5R110 “Torqueshift” transmission is about as bulletproof as any transmission Ford has ever made. Transmission problems are so infrequent that it is not worth mentioning. So it would appear that Finally Ford and International have hit a home run with this new motor, not counting the EPA mandated stuff that affects all three manufacturers. Well no. As a direct result of the 6.0 engine debacle(and other factors as well) Ford and international could never reconcile their differences and ended their long time partnership. So that means Ford is currently finishing up on inhousing their own design of Diesel engine codenamed “Scorpian”. This will be available for the 2011 model year giving the 6.4 a run time of a whopping 3 years. Even the heavily troubled 6.0 was in use for 5 model years in trucks and is still being used in Vans and other equipment.
fried_daddy likes this.
ranchininPink is offline  
Sponsored Links

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Ford Muscle Forums : Ford Muscle Cars Tech Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
powerstroke diesel 347LX All Ford Techboard 6 02-07-2007 06:32 PM
synthetic oil in powerstroke diesel Tracer64 Truck Forum 11 06-21-2006 03:28 PM
Duramax Diesel Chevy Trucks bud168 The Garage 17 09-30-2004 11:20 AM
DynoToms new ride! Ford Excursion Limited Powerstroke diesel. DynoTom The Garage 36 05-17-2003 07:55 AM
Powerstroke Diesel Mustang! jeremyl The Garage 9 01-31-2003 11:11 PM

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome