 |
|
08-29-2003, 10:45 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 29
|
255 Ford V8???
Did Ford ever make a 255 engine? I have found one at a salvage yard, What bell housing will fit it and how reliable or powerful can they be?
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
08-29-2003, 11:04 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,471
|
255 Ford V8???
Late model Mustang II and I believe they were also in the first "fox-body" mustangs...1979 pace car and Giha...they changed back to the 302 in 80 - 81 with a 2 bl carb.
It is kind of an orphan engine, because of the small cylinder bore you can't use the new big valve heads. Unless you have an orignality thing going on, it would be much easier to swap to a real 302, 289 or 351
|
|
|
08-30-2003, 04:44 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 29
|
255 Ford V8???
If a 302 intake and distributor will fit it, it is cheap enough...I might try it. It runs, has a aftermarket cam in it, I might run it a truck I have that has a 300-6 in it. If the intake and dist. are the same as a 302, I know where some of these are.
|
|
|
08-30-2003, 10:05 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 19
|
255 Ford V8???
The 255 was never found in the mustang II but was in 80 and 81 fox stangs. The heads intake ports are different than the rest of the windsor family so the intakes will not swap. I believe the distributor might interchange, but I'm not sure.
|
|
|
08-30-2003, 12:40 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 462
|
255 Ford V8???
Back away slowly then turn and run as fast as you can. The 300 I6 is much superior. Using the 255 for anything is almost like throwing money down a toilet.
|
|
|
08-30-2003, 12:46 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 29
|
255 Ford V8???
Thanks to all of you guys...youre...a book of knowledge.
|
|
|
08-30-2003, 01:23 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 903
|
255 Ford V8???
everything that ive learned about the ford 255 leads me to believe its crap, everyone that ive talked to so far pretty much says its crap. Like stated above, grab a 289, 302, or 351. Youll be much happier, I say gor for the 289=).
__________________
Thanks,
Kenny
1999 SVT Cobra
1996 3.8L Coupe
1968 302 Coupe
|
|
|
08-30-2003, 01:49 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Montana
Posts: 749
|
255 Ford V8???
Yes,Ford made a 255 V8(although Im sure they would rather not talk about it) 
Basicly a small bore 302, it was a waste of time.My car had one it it. Its Junk basicly and would pass on it if I was you.
__________________
Tim
|
|
|
08-31-2003, 04:06 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Indy
Posts: 3,692
|
255 Ford V8???
A 255 wouldn't even make a good boat anchor(it's not heavy enough).
|
|
|
09-01-2003, 10:09 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 199
|
255 Ford V8???
The 255 V8 was also used in the 80-82 Thunderbirds.
__________________
Tony Poole
[url]www.cardomain.com/id/birdman1993[/url]
[b]59 Thunderbird HT 430CID[/b]
[b]66 Tiger MkI[/b]
[b]89 SC Police Pursuit[/b]
[b]89 Super Coupe[/b]
[b]93 LX 331CID[/b]
[b]93 SC Blown 331[/b]
[b]2006 Ford GT[/b]
|
|
|
09-02-2003, 01:59 AM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Indy
Posts: 3,692
|
255 Ford V8???
Quote:
On 2003-09-01 10:09, Birdman93 wrote:
The 255 V8 was also used in the 80-82 Thunderbirds.
|
If it was it wasn't used in all of them. I had a 80 Cougar XR7 and an 81 T bird and both had a 2bbl 302.
|
|
|
09-04-2003, 09:03 AM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 199
|
255 Ford V8???
Both engines were offered as oprions. Here's thge funny part-the 255 had more power than the 302!!
__________________
Tony Poole
[url]www.cardomain.com/id/birdman1993[/url]
[b]59 Thunderbird HT 430CID[/b]
[b]66 Tiger MkI[/b]
[b]89 SC Police Pursuit[/b]
[b]89 Super Coupe[/b]
[b]93 LX 331CID[/b]
[b]93 SC Blown 331[/b]
[b]2006 Ford GT[/b]
|
|
|
09-05-2003, 05:54 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 809
|
255 Ford V8???
Quote:
On 2003-09-04 09:03, Birdman93 wrote:
Both engines were offered as oprions. Here's thge funny part-the 255 had more power than the 302!!
|
Nope... Fords advertising said... For its size it has 10% more hp than the 302. Meaning it had more HP per cu in, but not more hp overall.
_________________
1988 Turbo Coupe...5.0 Conversion... AOD... 3.73s
NA 13.11@105.32....W/90 Shot 12.23@112.19
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: TurboCoupe50 on 9/6/03 5:57am ]</font>
|
|
|
04-13-2009, 03:46 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 4
|
Re: 255 Ford V8???
It was an excellent car," Gurney says of Thompson’s ’62 Indy car.
As a Cobra team driver, in addition to F1 driving for Porsche, Gurney was involved in the test development of the aluminum small-block Ford V8 that became the Indy-car engine. It was essentially an aluminum version of the Fairlane 260 V8, sleeved down to 256 or 255 cubic inches (depending on whom you ask), drinking in its fuel-air mix through four Weber side-draft carburetors. The engine weighed 360 pounds and put out about 370 horsepower in race trim.
just some GOOD INFO... CAN YA BEET THAT?
BEEN RAC'N FORDZ SENCE 1971
|
|
|
04-13-2009, 03:48 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 4
|
Re: 255 Ford V8???
It was an excellent car," Gurney says of Thompson’s ’62 Indy car.
As a Cobra team driver, in addition to F1 driving for Porsche, Gurney was involved in the test development of the aluminum small-block Ford V8 that became the Indy-car engine. It was essentially an aluminum version of the Fairlane 260 V8, sleeved down to 256 or 255 cubic inches (depending on whom you ask), drinking in its fuel-air mix through four Weber side-draft carburetors. The engine weighed 360 pounds and put out about 370 horsepower in race trim.
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:59 AM.
|
|