289 Hi-po heads - Ford Muscle Forums : Ford Muscle Cars Tech Forum
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 56 (permalink) Old 10-20-2012, 11:53 AM Thread Starter
Subscriber
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,025
289 Hi-po heads

I got these 289 heads awhile back and was looking closer at both heads when I noticed some gold or yellow epoxy in all the intake bowls on one of the heads, I'm wondering if this was to fix mistakes or make the flow better. As you can see they have been ported and have other machine work done to them, I thought these would be great for a mild 280-300 hp build.
Can some of you guys enlighten me as to what that stuff is and is it safe for a daily driver. These heads were for SS class and the valves are stock size.





















RickRacer is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 56 (permalink) Old 10-20-2012, 07:53 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: central NY 13208
Posts: 6,355
Re: 289 Hi-po heads

those are not Hi-Po heads , just worked over regular heads
DanH is offline  
post #3 of 56 (permalink) Old 10-20-2012, 09:49 PM Thread Starter
Subscriber
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,025
Re: 289 Hi-po heads

According to my ford book head number C5AE is a Hi-Po head unless they printed the book wrong. I know there are no valve spring pockets but they do have the smaller 52-55cc chamber which is good.
RickRacer is offline  
 
post #4 of 56 (permalink) Old 10-21-2012, 06:41 AM Thread Starter
Subscriber
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,025
Re: 289 Hi-po heads

Here's a list of ford heads and it clearly says C5AE is a Hi-po head.

http://raceabilene.com/kelly/hotrod/engine3.html

I'm wondering if Ford used regular 289 heads for awhile and modified them and called them hi-po heads. There's no double bump 289 marks or spring pockets so maybe Ford went cheap?


Last edited by RickRacer; 10-21-2012 at 07:15 AM.
RickRacer is offline  
post #5 of 56 (permalink) Old 10-23-2012, 09:57 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Anaheim Hills, Ca
Posts: 1,477
Re: 289 Hi-po heads

Quote:
Originally Posted by DanH View Post
those are not Hi-Po heads , just worked over regular heads
I think they are Hi Po heads. I can make out the slotted pushrod holes in the first pic.

That looks like brazing in the exhaust ports...not epoxy

Tracy Blackford: Anaheim Hills, Ca
www.pacificthunderperformance.com
65 Mustang, 331 custom built with 289 H beam rods and 383W piston, 282S cam, self-ported '70 351w heads, T5z, 9" w/3.89s. 430 [email protected]
blkfrd is offline  
post #6 of 56 (permalink) Old 10-23-2012, 10:57 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: W (BY GOD) V
Posts: 5,337
Re: 289 Hi-po heads

Quote:
Originally Posted by RickRacer View Post

According to my ford book head number C5AE is a Hi-Po head unless they printed the book wrong. I know there are no valve spring pockets but they do have the smaller 52-55cc chamber which is good.
The HP head is C5AE-E.

DISCLAIMER-

The above posted information is in my opinion only. It may contain copy and paste material(s). Your opinion(s) and mileage may vary.
KULTULZ is offline  
post #7 of 56 (permalink) Old 10-23-2012, 01:06 PM
Tech Contributor Gold
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Amish Wonderland Of Central PA
Posts: 4,910
Garage
Re: 289 Hi-po heads

Whether they are Hipo or not doesn't really matter much now except as a conversation piece. Since they were ported, even if they were no doubt true HiPo's with the cast-in spring pockets, they are not worth much more than any other modified 289 head.

Quote:
Originally Posted by blkfrd View Post
I think they are Hi Po heads. I can make out the slotted pushrod holes in the first pic.
All early SBF Ford heads through 65' have slotted pushrod holes. The 289 HiPo's continued it through 67'.

Dennis

65' Stang Street/Strip. Dart 434W NA, Victor heads, G101A 4 Spd, 4:56 rear gear, on 93 octane pushing 3550lbs. [email protected]
dennis111 is offline  
post #8 of 56 (permalink) Old 10-23-2012, 08:15 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: central NY 13208
Posts: 6,355
Re: 289 Hi-po heads

Quote:
Originally Posted by RickRacer View Post
Here's a list of ford heads and it clearly says C5AE is a Hi-po head.

http://raceabilene.com/kelly/hotrod/engine3.html

I'm wondering if Ford used regular 289 heads for awhile and modified them and called them hi-po heads. There's no double bump 289 marks or spring pockets so maybe Ford went cheap?

you want them to be HiPo's , then they are ,
never try to sell them as hi po's
DanH is offline  
post #9 of 56 (permalink) Old 10-24-2012, 07:12 AM Thread Starter
Subscriber
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,025
Re: 289 Hi-po heads

Since there not hi-po heads they'll still work as good, sometimes wishing just isn't enough but Dan I wouldn't pass them off as hi-po likes like the guy I bought them from did to me. Of course it's my fault for not doing a better check and like Dennis said it doesn't really matter.

Anyone know how much getting bigging valves put in them might cost?
RickRacer is offline  
post #10 of 56 (permalink) Old 10-24-2012, 08:47 AM
Subscriber
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,216
Re: 289 Hi-po heads

Install hard seats starts around $125 or so last time I checked. Just putting in larger seats won't do it though. You'll need to grind on the heads or it will be money wasted. To pay somebody to work the heads will be cost prohibitive. It would be better to just get a better set of heads.

1965 289 mustang fastback

Last edited by Hottarod; 10-24-2012 at 08:50 AM.
Hottarod is offline  
post #11 of 56 (permalink) Old 10-24-2012, 11:07 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Anaheim Hills, Ca
Posts: 1,477
Re: 289 Hi-po heads

Quote:
Originally Posted by dennis111 View Post
Whether they are Hipo or not doesn't really matter much now except as a conversation piece. Since they were ported, even if they were no doubt true HiPo's with the cast-in spring pockets, they are not worth much more than any other modified 289 head.



All early SBF Ford heads through 65' have slotted pushrod holes. The 289 HiPo's continued it through 67'.
I stand corrected. If the rocker studs are screw in, I think this is the other give away for Hi Po 289 heads, but trying to tell some 45 years later if they came that way and haven't been modified is another story. Bottom line is that they are no different in terms of performance than stock 289 heads.

Tracy Blackford: Anaheim Hills, Ca
www.pacificthunderperformance.com
65 Mustang, 331 custom built with 289 H beam rods and 383W piston, 282S cam, self-ported '70 351w heads, T5z, 9" w/3.89s. 430 [email protected]
blkfrd is offline  
post #12 of 56 (permalink) Old 10-24-2012, 11:09 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Anaheim Hills, Ca
Posts: 1,477
Re: 289 Hi-po heads

You asked about larger valves, but the valves look larger than stock already. Have you measured their diameter?

Tracy Blackford: Anaheim Hills, Ca
www.pacificthunderperformance.com
65 Mustang, 331 custom built with 289 H beam rods and 383W piston, 282S cam, self-ported '70 351w heads, T5z, 9" w/3.89s. 430 [email protected]
blkfrd is offline  
post #13 of 56 (permalink) Old 10-24-2012, 02:08 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: W (BY GOD) V
Posts: 5,337
Re: 289 Hi-po heads

Quote:
Originally Posted by blkfrd View Post

I stand corrected. If the rocker studs are screw in, I think this is the other give away for Hi Po 289 heads, but trying to tell some 45 years later if they came that way and haven't been modified is another story. Bottom line is that they are no different in terms of performance than stock 289 heads.
Correct. As to whether they are correct HP heads or a production deviation is immaterial as the technology is ancient and the only true value of a set of untouched heads would be to a restorer or numbers correct freak like myself.

They were actually nothing special when they were introduced except maybe on the very first 260/289 performance engines.

DISCLAIMER-

The above posted information is in my opinion only. It may contain copy and paste material(s). Your opinion(s) and mileage may vary.
KULTULZ is offline  
post #14 of 56 (permalink) Old 10-25-2012, 12:14 PM Thread Starter
Subscriber
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,025
Re: 289 Hi-po heads

I know the valves look bigger but there stock for sure.....I had to measure them twice...LOL!
RickRacer is offline  
post #15 of 56 (permalink) Old 10-25-2012, 02:15 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 674
Garage
Re: 289 Hi-po heads

The only thing special were the exhaust ports were bigger and shaped better. Ford copied them for the GT40 heads. Been a while since porting a set but I think the intake runner was a bit straighter less of a bump around the guie hole. This kinda varried over the year casing to castings overr the years of SBF small port heads. Ported they flow up to 220isn at .500 lift so do the others. Exhaust can hit in the 190 range.
The other special thing was the small combustion chamber. A few years ago stock classes at the drags were hot for those heads and the 260 heads. Work best with the DOOE 351 size valves in them.
turbo2256b is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Ford Muscle Forums : Ford Muscle Cars Tech Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in











Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Anderson cam,lifters,pistons,canfield heads,y303 heads tonys10sec306 Engine 0 11-26-2011 06:39 AM
GT40 heads or 1968 302 montego heads? yztrailrider Mustang Pages (1965-1973) 6 06-19-2009 09:21 PM
anybody looking for boss 351 heads/351c closed chamber heads? XolieX All Ford Techboard 1 01-01-2004 07:12 AM
Ok Ford gears heads, who can idenitfy these heads oldstangs All Ford Techboard 14 11-16-2003 05:44 PM
1966 289...stock heads or 351W heads? Scooter All Ford Techboard 13 09-03-2003 06:24 PM

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome