Which would yall consider to be better for a street/strip car/truck. The lower powerband of the 2v or the all out power of the 4v? And Im not speaking of street like gridlock traffic, im refering to street as in smaller town traffic.
not a lot of info on what you want .Which would yall consider to be better for a street/strip car/truck. The lower powerband of the 2v or the all out power of the 4v? And Im not speaking of street like gridlock traffic, im refering to street as in smaller town traffic.
I personaly dont want anything i perfer the 4v myself. The way i see it, if your gonna get a 2v might as well get a windsor.not a lot of info on what you want .
to get both , a 2V on bank other bank a 4V
If the engine is built properly the 4V gives nothing to a 2v, I had a 4v in a 1969 mustang that would spin the tires off from a idle . At the strip with a set of slicks it run 12,82 at 108 mph. This was not a race car by any means and was happy up town.I personaly dont want anything i perfer the 4v myself. The way i see it, if your gonna get a 2v might as well get a windsor.
Canted valve heads move the valve away from the cylinder wall thusly not shrouding the air flow as much as the in line design. A couple of the best engines I did were Clev 2V heads on a W or a 302.I personaly dont want anything i perfer the 4v myself. The way i see it, if your gonna get a 2v might as well get a windsor.
not a lot of info on what you want .
to get both , a 2V on bank other bank a 4V
I bet that 302 would scream. I always figured a set of 4vc on the 302 (same heads as boss302) would just be too high winding, never thought about the 2v heads though. So those canted valves makes alot of difference? I know it was a better design just not how much better.Canted valve heads move the valve away from the cylinder wall thusly not shrouding the air flow as much as the in line design. A couple of the best engines I did were Clev 2V heads on a W or a 302.
you know!!!????????I bet that 302 would scream. I always figured a set of 4vc on the 302 (same heads as boss302) would just be too high winding, never thought about the 2v heads though. So those canted valves makes alot of difference? I know it was a better design just not how much better.
what would that reason be .for a street rig.. 2V, there's a reason they make intake port plates for the 4V..
well ill be damn, I honestly didnt know that. well ill rephrase my previous statement since you obviously have more experience/knowledge than me (Not being sarcastic). I 'thought' that the canted valves were a better design. lolyou know!!!????????
then you don't know the Yates head replaced the canted valve - Ford's SVO race heads
then , and then and
the valve angles are just part of what makes a good head .well ill be damn, I honestly didnt know that. well ill rephrase my previous statement since you obviously have more experience/knowledge than me (Not being sarcastic). I 'thought' that the canted valves were a better design. lol
what would that reason be .the valve angles are just part of what makes a good head .
will tell you after your great knowledge of port plates is explained.what would that reason be .
details on your testing would be great info
The 2v heads are "better" on the street because they are able to maintain a higher port velocity at lower RPMs but tend to hit their limits around the 6500 RPM mark in stock form. The 4v heads on the other hand have poor port velocity at lower RPMs because the ports are just so big, however, at higher RPMs (4000+) they really come alive.Lol like i said im here to learn, i am at yalls mercy....just take it easy lol im young and learning everything myself.