I started with my engine as the baseline. It ran somewhere in the mid
12's based on the configuration in the first entry.
fan water pump lash rockers timing gas c/r hp gain
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
flex prod .022 1.6 38 93 9.5 395
elec prod .022 1.6 38 93 9.5 408 13
elec prod .017 1.6 38 93 9.5 418 10
no alternator at this point
elec elec .017 1.6 38 93 9.5 433 15
elec elec .017 1.6 40 107 9.5 438 5
elec elec .017 1.7 40 107 9.5 447 9
elec elec .017 1.7 40 107 10.5 461 14
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm not really sure how realistic these numbers are. It assumes that the engine is capable of making the extra horsepower. This is based on
looking at my ets and running engine analyzer simulations. My best run so far was with the configuration at the third to bottom entry and that was an 11.72 et with a total weight of 2950 pounds at the start line. That does appear to reflect the predicted horsepower I think. Other changes were also made for that though such as tricking out the carb and changing tire size.
Soon(yeah someday the way things are going) I will be able to run the bottom line configuration except maybe not the 1.7 rockers and the heads have been ported again. I will have the 10.5 compression from having the heads angle cut but now the car has a heavier curb weight and I'm not sure yet what that is.
12's based on the configuration in the first entry.
fan water pump lash rockers timing gas c/r hp gain
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
flex prod .022 1.6 38 93 9.5 395
elec prod .022 1.6 38 93 9.5 408 13
elec prod .017 1.6 38 93 9.5 418 10
no alternator at this point
elec elec .017 1.6 38 93 9.5 433 15
elec elec .017 1.6 40 107 9.5 438 5
elec elec .017 1.7 40 107 9.5 447 9
elec elec .017 1.7 40 107 10.5 461 14
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm not really sure how realistic these numbers are. It assumes that the engine is capable of making the extra horsepower. This is based on
looking at my ets and running engine analyzer simulations. My best run so far was with the configuration at the third to bottom entry and that was an 11.72 et with a total weight of 2950 pounds at the start line. That does appear to reflect the predicted horsepower I think. Other changes were also made for that though such as tricking out the carb and changing tire size.
Soon(yeah someday the way things are going) I will be able to run the bottom line configuration except maybe not the 1.7 rockers and the heads have been ported again. I will have the 10.5 compression from having the heads angle cut but now the car has a heavier curb weight and I'm not sure yet what that is.