Ford Muscle Cars Tech Forum banner

1 - 7 of 7 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
2 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
I have a formula for calculating cubic
inches-
Bore x 3.14(pie)=result x stroke=result x
No. of cyl=Cubic inches.

Example: 302- 4.00 x 3.14=12.56 X 3.00=37.68 x 8=301.44 Cu in
This formula works for the 302,289(288.3776),351(351.6
.
But the 429 comes in at 393.3696??
The 460 is a 421.8584-quite a difference!
This is assuming a bore of 4.362 for both the 429 & 460. Stroke of 3.59 for the 429
& stroke of 3.85 for the 460.
Am i missing something or is this a case
of false advertising?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
165 Posts
here is one that I use and it works every time and it is right on the money

bore x bore x stroke x number of cylinders x .7854

example 460BBF

4.360 x 4.360 x 3.85 x 8 x .7854 = 459.8483

easy to remember and very close every time try it out.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
280 Posts
Your flaw comes from doing PI x bore diam.
Bore diam x PI give circumference of bore.
What you want is area of bore.
You need PI x radius squared.
ie 3.1415 x (bore diam/2)^2
ie for a 302 its OK cos its 4 inch and half 4 inch squared is 4 inch, but when its 4.2 inch its 2.1 x 2.1 = 4.41.
Thats where you 429 / 460 started to come out wrong.

On 2002-02-26 21:57, stvitus2002 wrote:
I have a formula for calculating cubic
inches-
Bore x 3.14(pie)=result x stroke=result x
No. of cyl=Cubic inches.

Example: 302- 4.00 x 3.14=12.56 X 3.00=37.68 x 8=301.44 Cu in
This formula works for the 302,289(288.3776),351(351.6
.
But the 429 comes in at 393.3696??
The 460 is a 421.8584-quite a difference!
This is assuming a bore of 4.362 for both the 429 & 460. Stroke of 3.59 for the 429
& stroke of 3.85 for the 460.
Am i missing something or is this a case
of false advertising?
 
1 - 7 of 7 Posts
Top