Ford Muscle Cars Tech Forum banner

1 - 17 of 17 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
176 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
ok guys heres the deal im going to be building a stroker andi want to go with a 347 but i have been reading that becasue of the piston design they burn oil im just wondering from your expierence do they really burn oil should i go with a 331

thanks jeff
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
176 Posts
Discussion Starter · #2 ·
and also what would you choose for a usually street driven daily driver in the summer i have herd of some other problems for the 347 rather then the 331
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,311 Posts
Your maxing out the piston wear for a 347. They run great, but dont expect 80000 miles out of them from what Ive read. A 331 is a great compromise.
Good luck
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
55 Posts
My last trip to the Knotts Berry Farm show in April I used 1/2 quart of oil driving over from Phoenix, AZ, a 900 mile round trip. Of that 1/2 quart, I'd estimate that 90% came from my leaky oil pan. Not bad IMO for a 347, heck my old 302 used more oil than that
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,892 Posts
There are many production motors with a worse rod ratio than the 347. A 400 small block chevy would be one. Think I'd expect much more than 80,000.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
440 Posts
Mine burn about a quart in a 1000 right now with about 7000 miles on it.
The motor did the same thing as a 302, maybe a little worse as a 302. Bruce
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
91 Posts
As I understand, the problem is with the rod length used in nearly every 347 stroker kit, a 5.400 in. rod. This pushes the wrist pin up into the ring area, therefore, oil gets through, and burns. However, Coast High Performace (www.coasthigh.com) does offer a decent stroker kit with a shorter rod (5.315 in.) to eliminate the common oil burning problem.

_________________
1964 Falcon - 260 V8 with a C4
2001 Ford Taurus - 3.0L V6, 24 Valve
2001 Ranger Edge, torsion bar lift, 31 BFG's

<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: FlyByFord on 5/15/06 7:15pm ]</font>
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,233 Posts
What he said !! Look at alot of new motors (LS1, LS2, 4.6, 5.4) They All seem to have oil burning, Piston Knocking and Head Gasket problems !!!
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
5,551 Posts
Dang right. Most new engines burn oil. My neighbor paid $66,000 for a new Corvette and it burns oil. My Lightning burns oil. So what! Get what you want and forget about burning a little oil.

If you're that worried about it, perhaps you should get yourself an electric car.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
4,520 Posts
we just went thru this subject on two different threads in the last week. It would save a lot of band width to just review those threads.

It's just tiresome to rehash this subject so soon after going thru it a few days ago.

Maybe one of the guys can point you to the threads?

http://www.fordmuscle.com/forums/late-model-efi-techboard/347-stroker_50296.html

http://www.fordmuscle.com/forums/all-ford-techboard/347-stroker-kit-with-shorter-rods_51105.html

http://www.fordmuscle.com/forums/all-ford-techboard/450-rwhp-sleeper-maverick-project-thoughts_51097.html


_________________
"Your role may be thankless, but if you are willing to give it your all ... You just may bring happiness to those that outlast you."-- Sacrifice


<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Beoweolf on 5/15/06 10:32pm ]</font>
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
176 Posts
Discussion Starter · #13 ·
well im not really concerned with the oil burning issue what i was trying to get at is does it burn a quart and month or a quart a week im just wondering if it consumes alot i think we all check our or once a week or when its nessassary so that fact that it burns oil isnt really a problem
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,233 Posts
Hate to break your stones, but thats a real open ended question?!?! I don't think any one her could honestly answer that or give you a real answer. How about, It shouldn't burn any more than any other high performance engine.....................
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
300 Posts
I drove my little 347 around town for a couple years (before going solid roller) and it never burnt ANY noticeable amount of oil, and I ran Mobil 1 synthetic in it. It was the 5.315" rod setup. I think it's not even an issue with newer technology stuff and good build technique.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
228 Posts
Strokers built with blocks that have marginal wall thickness are at risk no matter what you do.

Do the sonic reports, set the clearance right, use a good ring pack and follow the recommendations EXACTLY and you should be fine.

The short rods in most combos do put more load on the thrust side, but there are some better ones out there with longer rods that minimize it. An engineer could calculate the additional load.

Part of the problem is when production blocks get treated like race hardware. At no time did the Ford engineers anticipate an extra 1/2 of stroke after an overbore (!) with the increased cylinder pressure and rpm of a highly built stroker engine ... at the same time they were trying to get every last ounce of iron out of the block. And ya cant tell me anyone builds a 347 to go to the store and never gets on it.

To really do it right, you need one of the FRPP HD Ford blocks if you want it to live a good long time while thrashing it on the strip and the street. The thicker walls and sturdy webs will help it hold up under the higher loads; they're made for it.

Plenty of guys make the production blocks work, but they are on borrowed time IMHO considering the relative cylinder wall thickness with the pressure and load they are under hanging the fronts a few feet in the air (like CometGT1974's bad ride!!)

Good luck!
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
176 Posts
Discussion Starter · #17 ·
ok well thanks guys i know all engines burn oil and im not asking if it burns a teaspoon in 10,000 miles all i wanted to know was if it was a problem with these style engines
 
1 - 17 of 17 Posts
Top