Ford Muscle Cars Tech Forum banner

1 - 4 of 4 Posts

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
2,806 Posts
Discussion Starter #3
The only thing I see wrong is the cam is too small for that cubic inch and overall combo. Needs at minimum a 260 at .050 cam just to get the powerband to 6000RPM but that is easily fixed. I think it needs a rear suspension make over or serious tweakage to handle the power on launch. Now I know what my '68 Falcon wagon engine bay will look like with the big block. Tight yet right!
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,929 Posts
The cams a minor problem. The rear could be helped with some good TRI COUNTY springs. They flat work! Shocks are easy. Probably weighs 4200lbs.
 
1 - 4 of 4 Posts
Top